Monday, 28 December 2009

Whoopee - Joe's found another war!

“Iraq was yesterday's war. Afghanistan is today's war. If we don't act pre-emptively, Yemen will be tomorrow's war"
.
Yes folks, Smokin’ Joe Lieberman is on the warpath yet again. Like all the rest of the Vietnam-dodging chicken hawks he’s always full of fight. Providing he or his aren't doing the fighting.

The minute I read of the Nigerian Islamic plane burning incident I knew that the US ‘defence’ industry would see an opportunity. Not an opportunity to do anything about the real dangers of course, but an opportunity to launch another war that will use lots and lots of weapons and provide lots and lots of business for the Blackwaters and Halliburtons of this world.

Just what the US needs.... heading towards bankruptcy, embroiled in two unwinnable wars and an earlier humiliating in Somalia – all enthusiastically supported by Joe. But then – to me at least - US needs aren't paramount in his mind. He, with his dual American/Israeli citizenship, holds the unique position of being in effect Likud’s ambassador to the US while heading the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. ..
.
How daft does it get?
.
Fact is, America is bleeding blood and treasure, as it always has done, to fight Israel’s enemies in the Middle East. Don’t forget that Lieberman is also an enthusiastic supporter of using American men and money to attack Iran as well.

Lieberman is the best politician that money can buy. He’s paid his dues by emasculating the health bill (no bad thing in itself, pity about the motivation) at the behest of his (and his wife’s) paymasters in the health industry. And now he’s taking his marching orders from his political masters in Tel Aviv.

He’s laughing all the way to the bank.

He doesn’t worry. And he’s right. It’s probable that the American sheeple can be bamboozledyet again by the MSM into flying the flag and supporting this war, just like they were on all the others.

I'm convinced that in a hundred years time – if the Neocons’ wars haven’t finished us all of by then, that historians will look back and ask, in total bewilderment, how did the American people allow themselves to be so blatantly manipulated to enthusiastically participate in their own demise?

An afterthought: If the chickenhawk Neocons really want to fuck up Yemen, why don’t they deport all their Wall St. paymasters there? If they did a tenth of the damage they’ve done to the US they’d be better than a hundred conventional armies.

Saturday, 26 December 2009

The solution to Affirmative Action?

Those of us who’ve opposed affirmative action have focused on its inherent unfairness and impracticality in favouring less capable/qualified people. Essentially it means showing that favouring lower qualified ‘minorities’ over white males resulted in wasted resources, reduced performance and low levels of achievement wherever it was applied, as well as being self-evidently unfair.

The Hartford fire-fighters was typical case. Would someone of lower intelligence with less inclination to work be better positioned to make crucial on-the-spot decisions such as what length hose or what power pump? Of course showing this to be both inequitable and inefficient was as easy as shooting fish in a barrel.

But it made no difference, the madness persists.

But what if we turned the whole debate on its head? What if, instead of focusing on the under-representation of under-achieving ethnic groups, we shifted the debate to the over-representation of certain ethnic groups?

Now there’s no prize for guessing which ethnic group is massively over-represented just about everywhere, business, politics, law, medicine, academia, science – everywhere except sport. Now it’s clear to me that this over-representation is due to the same factors that cause black under-representation – intelligence and work ethic (throw in a bit of ethnic solidarity as well, of course).

The supreme irony here of course is that Jews are, and always have been, at the forefront of the AA army. Replace evil white males with under-represented minorities (read blacks). But what if Jews, think the NY Times, were asked to lead by example?

What if the next time a Jewish commentator or academic insisted on more non-white representation the response were to be ‘fine. But will you step aside and while doing so agree to reduce Jews’ representation in the Senate to two Senators, have Jews represent only 2% of Harvard’s next intake, and occupy a similar ratio on the NYT editorial board?’

Needless to say it wouldn’t work in the sense that there’d be no significant change in the ratios. But it might result in Jews shifting uncomfortably in their seats and realising that this thing could cut both ways. And the one thing you can never accuse Jews of is being unrealistic!

Friday, 25 December 2009

Christmas

Best wishes to all of you and hope we get a WHITE Christmas!!!

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

The new Surgeon General

You’re looking to appoint the Surgeon General – the top Government medical post in the US. Where do you look for a suitable candidate, one capable of inspiring a new generation of medical break-throughs? The Mayo Clinic? Harvard Medical School?

Or an obscure backwoods practice lost somewhere in a Louisiana swamp?

If you’re part of Obama’s ‘colour-blind’ Administration, you’d go for the last option. Why? Because it’s one of the few places you’ll find a black physician. And being black seems to be the one and only qualification that Dr. Regina Benjamin – a 20 stone mountain of fat - seems to have.
.
Admittedly she ‘graduated’ from one of the country’s handful of black medical schools. These ‘graduates’ are so poorly qualified that almost all end up in administrative roles on the government payroll. In those instances where they are let loose on the general public the results can be literally life-threatening, as in the case of the Martin Luther King Hospital in Los Angeles which had to be closed down to protect the public.

With such a background you’d hardly expect her to announce some stunning innovative thinking in her maiden speech. And she didn’t disappoint.

“In what was one of her first speeches to a large crowd since she was sworn in Nov. 3, Dr. Regina Benjamin noted that the proportion of U.S. physicians who are minorities is only 6 percent—the same proportion as a century ago.

In a 27-minute speech, Benjamin told health leaders in the audience to encourage young minorities to pursue careers in medicine or other ambitions.”

That's right folks, she spent nearly half an hour whingeing that ‘minorities’ (read blacks – there are huge numbers of Asian doctors in the US) are under-represented. ‘It be racism’, I presume was her message.
.
Blacks have a big problem in graduating from proper medical schools because, with their lower IQ levels they can't handle the academic workload. It’s as simple as that. Wherever you see black PhDs you’ll note that they’re invariably in the soft subjects like ebonics, black history, languages, racism reparation studies or other crap like that. And that's so because faculty in those fields, being culturally sensitive, can award the highest degrees, secure in the knowledge that it doesn’t matter and that nobody really gives a shit anyway.

However, in science, engineering and medicine there’s usually only one right answer. And that's where blacks come unstuck. According to two of my friends who are doctors in the US, reputable medical schools there did try to push through unqualified blacks a few decades ago – at the expense of whites, of course. However, they failed their internships in droves, which then (happily) reflected back on the medical school faculty.
.
Presumably then the new SG will be pleased with another medical initiative from the colour-blind Obama Administration. Thanks to Rastus for this link to the National Review)

“It directs the secretary of health and human services to award federal grants worth billions of dollars to educational institutions that train medical-service providers. However, “priority” for federal dollars is to be given only to those institutions offering “preferential” admissions to underrepresented minorities”

The measure will force medical institutions to hire based on race and sex, not qualifications, and to lower their admission standards, which will lead to even more “low-quality” doctors. Medical students admitted based on lower qualifications generally perform more poorly on licensing exams.Race-based admissions end up endangering patients — such as those treated by Patrick Chavis, one of whom bled to death due to Chavis’s medical malpractice.


Chavis was the black applicant admitted to the University of California at Davis Medical School even though he had much weaker academic qualifications than Allan Bakke, a white applicant who was rejected from the school and subsequently was the plaintiff in a famous Supreme Court case. Chavis eventually lost his medical license because of his gross negligence, incompetence, and “inability to perform some of the most basic duties required of a physician.”

By the way, in 1996 (before Chavis was found out), Senator Edward M. Kennedy called him a "perfect example" of how affirmative action worked.

Boy, Ted got a lot of things wrong, but he sure struck paydirt with that!

As the song goes, ‘when will they ever learn’. Why don't white Americans rise up in righteous indignation?

Saturday, 19 December 2009

Diversity is strength: It's also burying sick children alive

There was a time when the concept of cultural relativism added some value. For centuries we’d been hamstrung by supposedly God-inspired moral absolutism which allowed self-appointed moral guardians rule our lives with rods of iron. Such absolutism was moderated in more recent times by concepts such as situational ethics (right or wrong is based on the particular situation) and cognitive relativism (truth itself has no objective standard).

Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. It's the philosophical notion that all cultural beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the cultural environment. Those who hold to cultural relativism hold that all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity.

But just like other initially worthwhile elements of multi-culti peecee doctrine, the (small) baby of cultural relativism has not so much been thrown out with the bathwater but rammed down the plughole with great force. We’re now at the stage where the most noxious primitive customs are accorded moral and cultural equivalence with those of the advanced western democracies.

Here I have in mind things like honour killings, stoning for adultery, killing children for their organs for use in traditional medicine, all of which we’re meant to sympathetically nod in understanding - ‘it’s their culture’.

Now the video here shows scenes which could – or at least should – occasion even the most deluded sociology professor to get a grip.

Here’s what the Telegraph has to say about the practice in general:

"Babies born into some Indian tribes in the Amazon are being buried alive, a practice that is being covered up by the Brazilian authorities out of respect for tribal culture [there we go again!] The tradition is based on beliefs that babies with any sort of physical defect have no souls and that others, such as twins or triplets, are also "cursed". Babies who are girls, who have some disability or who have unmarried mothers are all in danger of an early death in a shallow grave in the rainforest."

If you can stomach it, take a look, and thank Providence if you live in an advanced, tolerant and civilised society. And maybe as a bonus it’ll build your determination to hold on to what we have and fight back against the invasion of our lands by the forces of darkness

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

Having Mum for dinner

Apropos the previous post........



Here's a comment on this post from W. Baker. Really good:

"That's a funny - and, yet, serious picture, Savant. Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that it wasn't Photoshopped, and that it was a holiday snap of some stupid slag from the Midlands on a 'eco' trip.She's in the Amazon obviously thinking that Christian - or post-Christian - mores tolerate nude sunbathing; and her diversity training since nursery school assures her that the natives are gentle souls with a penchant for loin clothes and really cool body paint....

It's never crossed the poor gal's mind that Piranha and Candiru aren't very good for your health.That's the West in a picture: oblivious to the reality of barbaric, non-christian cultures who generally hold women in the same regard as they hold dogs or goats, and, yet thinking the complete opposite."

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

Diversity is strength: It's also eating monkeys

Discretely hidden away in a remote corner of the Irish Times we learn the following:

"A parcel containing monkey meat was discovered at a postal sorting office in Drogheda yesterday, the Department of Agriculture said. The package was understood to have contained the bodies of two monkeys and a number of monkey legs which were to be eaten. Customs officials are investigating and it is believed the package may have been sent from Nigeria. A department spokeswoman said the "bush meat" had been seized as it had entered the country illegally. "
.
Bless me! Nigerians behaving illegally! What ever next?

My scientific friends tell me that such bush meat is potentially lethal, as it can introduce bacteria and viruses (it's the source of the ebola virus and possible of AIDS) to which native Irish would have no immunity. And if all the Irish died, who’d pay the Nigerians’ social welfare? I think they should remember that.

But such imports can be found wherever we celebrate diversity. Take this story from the US.

"A federal judge took mercy on a Staten Island mother of eight [she has three more, apparently not here own. But who knows?] and sentenced her Friday to probation for smuggling monkey meat into New York.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Green argued that Mamie Manneh was not entitled to leniency because she has 11 prior arrests—including one for running over her husband’s suspected mistress with an SUV—and cooked up a bogus defense that she had a constitutional right to eat bushmeat. "

As you can see from the photo, Mamie is a one-woman production line for future muggers and rapists.
.
Which begs the question, if she had 11 previous offences, how much time did she serve, given that she’s cranked out so many cultural enrichers in the meantime? Probably got 11 warnings. After all, maybe it’s their culture to take out mistresses as well, and we can't deny cultural relativism, can we?

Saturday, 12 December 2009

Sense from Bill Cosby

I've said repeatedly that it takes a black person to talk sense to, not just blacks, but even more importantly to realign the white 'useful idiots' on e a reality-based path. Here's real wisdom from Bill Cosby, which should be posted in two-foot high letters in every social welfare centre and school.
"I can't even talk the way these people talk:

Why you ain't, Where you is, What he drive, Where he stay, Where he work, Who you be......
.
And I blamed the kid until I heard the mother talk. And then I heard the father talk. Everybody knows it's important to speak English except these knuckleheads.
.
You can't be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouthIn fact you will never get any kind of job making a decent living. People marched and were hit in the face with rocks to get an Education, and now we've got these knuckleheads walking around.

The lower economic people are not holding up their end in this deal. These people are not parenting. They are buying things for kids. $500 sneakers for what? And they won't spend $200 for Hooked on Phonics.
.
I am talking about these people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit. Where were you when he was 2? Where were you when he was 12? Where were you when he was 18 and how come you didn't know that he had a pistol? And where is the father? Or who is his father?

People putting their clothes on backward: Isn't that a sign of something gone wrong? People with their hats on backward, pants down around the crack, isn't that a sign of something? Isn't it a sign of something when she has her dress all the way up and got all type of needles [piercing] going through her body?
.
What part of Africa did this come from?? We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don't know a thing about Africa .....
.

With names like Shaniqua, Taliqua and Mohammed and all of that crap ......... and all of them are in jail. Brown or black versus the Board of Education is no longer the white person's problem. We have got to take the neighborhood back.

People used to be ashamed. Today a woman has eight children with eight different 'husbands' -- or men or whatever you call them now. We have millionaire football players who cannot read. We have million-dollar basketball players who can't write two paragraphs.
.
We, as black folks have to do a better job.. Someone working at Wal-Mart with seven kids, you are hurting us. We have to start holding each other to a higher standard.We cannot blame the white people any longer.'





Friday, 11 December 2009

The good ole' days




"When I were a lad, Granny would send me down to t'corner store wi' a shilling....and that's only 5 pence in today's money

and I'd come back wi' five pounds o' potatoes,

two loaves o' bread,

three pints o' milk,

a pound o' cheese,

a packet o' tea,

an' 'alf a dozen eggs.

Yer can't do that these days....No way!...


Too many damn security cameras around now."

Sunday, 6 December 2009

If there were only whites in South Africa.....

Interesting post in MySASucks blog.

Key excerpts:

We would be able to boast one of the lowest crime-rates in the world, as our whites here commit almost no crime.

Due to the above sentence, a lot less money would be spent on prisons and police so it would go to other things.

Our economy would still be in the top 30

We wouldn’t have to spend every cent we have on expensive houses in secure estates

We wouldn’t be forced to immigrate from what can be a beautiful country

Our rugby team would be unstoppable as useless quota players wouldn’t make it – and no, Habana’s not that good

We could hire excellent people to help run our business, instead of some thief who will steal from you and ruin your business

We could take lovely strolls through town, admiring the scenery and the shops

Kids could go to public school without the stress of being beaten or killed for nothing (whites don’t beat up people who haven’t done anything to them)

Our president would be able to talk properly and wouldn’t embarrass us

We would have great doctors and a well-structured healthcare system

Electricity would be consistently available and affordable as the coal wouldn’t be purchased from BEE companies

We would be considered a 1st world country

Innocent white girls wouldn’t be getting AIDS because they got raped

Food would be more affordable

We wouldn’t have to have anxiety attacks when stopped at a robot

Those 3083 white farmers would still be here

We wouldn’t be startled by every noise we hear at night


Now I could add that whites would also have to do all their own dirty work. But otherwise what's said here is correct. Whereas individual blacks can be fine, as an ethnic group they are always and everywhere vastly more violent and welfare-dependent than other races. Their criminality is orders of magnitude greater than whites, while their families have high levels of disfunctionality. In short, wherever and whenever they move in, standards begin to decline, and that decline then increases geometrically.

We should remember that as we allow vast numbers of them congregate in Europe

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

Open discussion in Sweden

The Local describes itself as ‘Sweden’s News In English’. Which it is. And just like the rest of the media in that country it’s relentlessly Orwellian in its reporting, as dictated by the Orwellian ‘independent journalists’ union – see this post. If you read it (I don't recommend this!) you’ll see an endless paean to the joys of diversity, and never ever, ever anything that would suggest immigrants aren't all uncanonised saints.

But Sweden's proud position at the top of Europe’s Rape League Table, and the distinctly un-Swedish habits of Muslim refugees do pose some challenges for The Local’s ‘journalists’. For example, what’s an ‘independent journalist’ to do when a Muslim takes a fourth simultaneous wife, this time one that's ten years old, and then cuts his daughter’s throat for wearing a revealing burka?

Well, it goes something like this: “Swedish man charged with attack on daughter’. To the uninitiated, this could be someone named Sven Carlson giving his daughter a black eye. And of course that’s what you're meant to believe.

But Swedes are starting to act like their counterparts under another totalitarian system, Communism. (Check my post here). If a Russian read in Pravda ‘Comrade Brezhnev is suffering from a mild cold’ they’d have instantly realised that he was at death’s door. So Swedes now are beginning to realise immediately that the ‘Swedish man’ is nothing of the sort.

Anyway, I occasionally post a comment to The Local. Nothing ‘offensive’ (i.e. nothing even remotely like the ‘n’ word, no bad language, just skewering the ludicrous claptrap that passes for journalism on that rag). What happens? After fewer than ten such comments I've been silenced!

If I try to comment George Orwell comes back with “Posting privileges currently suspended”. It’s not currently, it’s permanently.

Yes folks, that's what passes for the marketplace of ideas in the Swedish media.

However, following on the Swiss minarets initiative, there is hope. Even in Sweden. It seems a Muslim cultural enricher decided that due to Islamic modesty she didn’t want to be bothered with Swedish hygiene regulations. She sued the agency for refusing her a job. Now you’d imagine that the dhimmi courts in that country would fall over themselves to apologise for the ‘offense’ and to order the dental agency to desist.

Hold on to something solid now, because…………..the court threw out her case. And not only that, they awarded costs against her!

I wonder did the judge read my comments in The Local?